Editorial Policy#

Mission#

OutrightAttack.com advocates for cognitive liberty while preserving factual discipline, uncertainty, lawful safety boundaries, and fair representation of legitimate counterarguments.

Claim states#

Publications distinguish:

documented fact;
official or court finding;
public allegation;
expert interpretation;
editorial interpretation;
emerging evidence;
contested evidence;
inference;
unknown;
hypothetical scenario;
policy proposal.

Source discipline#

Current laws, regulatory status, officeholders, product behavior, deployment claims, statistics, and active conflicts require current verification. Primary and authoritative sources are preferred. Supplied reports are research inputs, not automatic authorities.

Advocacy#

The publication openly supports mental privacy, transparent influence, visible moderation, human review, meaningful appeal, and accountable AI. Advocacy must not conceal evidence that complicates the case.

Corrections#

Material errors should be corrected promptly. Substantive changes should preserve the date, reason, and prior state where practical. Readers may submit corrections through /participate.

Privacy and dignity#

Do not publish unnecessary private information, amateur diagnosis, dehumanizing characterization, or speculative profiles of private people.

Historical and sociological reports about uprisings, protests, warfare, children in armed groups, and generational alienation remain private durable memory. The public site may use them only for carefully sourced cognitive-liberty analysis concerning oppression, self-censorship, institutional trust, coercion, trauma, civic resilience, accountability, and recovery.

Editorial Policy