Public research + charter initiative

The outright attack on cognitive liberty

The mind has become measurable, targetable, and commercially valuable. OutrightAttack.com documents the systems that shape attention, infer vulnerability, simulate trust, and convert prediction into power—then builds a rights framework for resisting them.

14
research dossiers
14
draft rights
4
evidence states
MENTAL PRIVACYALGORITHMIC CHOICESYNTHETIC IDENTITYPREDICTIVE DUE PROCESSCOGNITIVE SELF-DETERMINATION

00 / DEFINITION

Cognitive liberty is the right to mental self-determination.

It includes freedom of lawful thought, mental privacy, meaningful consent, identity continuity, protection from covert manipulation, and the ability to question or refuse systems that infer and influence inner states.

“Attack” does not imply one hidden mastermind. It names a convergence of commercial incentives, state power, military doctrine, platform architecture, synthetic media, and human vulnerability.

01 / ATTACK SURFACES

Six systems now compete for the conditions of thought.

Open full map
01Documented

Perception infrastructure

Ranking, recommendation, search, trending, moderation, and notifications decide what is visible, credible, urgent, or socially normal.

Inspect surface
02Documented

Synthetic identity

AI-generated faces, voices, biographies, witnesses, experts, employees, and peers can borrow human trust without possessing human accountability.

Inspect surface
03Emerging / contested

Adaptive persuasion

Systems can alter framing, timing, tone, and content in response to behavioral feedback, creating an asymmetry between the observer and the observed.

Inspect surface
04Documented / emerging

Psychological authority

Fluent, always-available systems can become advisors, companions, interpreters of reality, and substitutes for human relationships or professional care.

Inspect surface
05Documented / emerging

Synthetic consensus

Coordinated networks can simulate social proof, artificial disagreement, conversion, and majority opinion while exhausting verification capacity.

Inspect surface
06Documented

Predictive governance

Population forecasts can guide aid, but individual or community risk scores can convert probability into suspicion, surveillance, or punishment.

Inspect surface

02 / THE IMPERATIVE

Rights must be written before cognitive infrastructure becomes invisible.

Privacy law largely protects data after it is collected. Cognitive liberty asks an earlier question: should a system be allowed to infer, optimize, or intervene in the inner life at all?

ConsentProvenanceContestabilityHuman agency

03 / EVIDENCE DISCIPLINE

Urgency without exaggeration.

Documented

Supported by public records, audits, court filings, peer-reviewed studies, or confirmed deployments.

Emerging

Demonstrated in controlled research, limited deployments, or credible early evidence; scale and durability remain uncertain.

Contested

Evidence is mixed, causal claims are disputed, or commercial claims exceed independent validation.

Scenario

A defensive projection used to test resilience. It is not presented as a current event or proven capability.

Editorial rule: a capability is not treated as a proven social effect merely because it is technically possible, widely discussed, or visible in a laboratory. Causation, scale, duration, and alternative explanations remain explicit.

04 / RESEARCH LIBRARY

Read the evidence behind the charter.

View all 14 dossiers

WHAT THIS PROJECT DOES

Documents systems, tests claims, and proposes rights.

  • Separates documented events from emerging capabilities and scenarios.
  • Connects technical design to autonomy, due process, and human rights.
  • Publishes defensive frameworks without reproducing operational abuse instructions.
  • Invites correction, criticism, and public charter participation.

WHAT IT DOES NOT CLAIM

No omnipotent mind control. No single hidden controller.

  • Persuasion is not guaranteed compliance.
  • Prediction is not knowledge of an individual future.
  • AI-generated content is not automatically deceptive.
  • Defending cognitive liberty does not justify censorship, surveillance, or vigilantism.

THE PUBLIC DRAFT IS OPEN

The mind should not become an ungoverned extraction surface.

Help write the charter

Search the archive

ProvenanceDependencySurveillance