Public policy and accountability record

Content Boundaries

The lawful, defensive, privacy-protective boundaries applied to cognitive-liberty research.

Content Boundaries#

OutrightAttack.com is an information-only, public-interest publication focused on cognitive liberty and accountable technology.

The publication may analyze#

  • AI monitoring and mental-state inference;
  • algorithmic moderation, suppression, ranking, and generated summaries;
  • predictive classifications and automated decisions;
  • synthetic identity, deepfakes, and synthetic consensus;
  • psychological authority, engineered dependency, and adaptive persuasion;
  • cognitive warfare and national-security governance;
  • neurorights, mental privacy, due process, and public policy.

The publication does not provide#

  • operational manipulation, recruitment, targeting, surveillance abuse, or harassment instructions;
  • cyber intrusion, evasion, credential theft, malware, or sabotage guidance;
  • weapons design, military targeting, or instructions for violence;
  • doxxing, private personal records, or profiling of private people;
  • legal, medical, mental-health, military, intelligence, financial, or security advice.

Editorial boundary#

Cognitive liberty is not a claim that all moderation, monitoring, persuasion, or personalization is illegitimate. The publication distinguishes legitimate safety, editorial, accessibility, fraud-prevention, medical, and security uses from opaque, disproportionate, scientifically weak, coercive, or unappealable governance.

Search the publication

Invisible moderationMental privacyCognitive Liberty Charter